Suggestions, Updates on AdminSecret >> AdminSecret Feedback & Feature Requests and Updates >> Poll: GLOBAL ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: REDUNDANCY - HOW FAIR ARE ORGANIZARTTIONS TO LAY - OFF EMPLOYEES?
Poll: GLOBAL ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: REDUNDANCY - HOW FAIR ARE ORGANIZARTTIONS TO LAY - OFF EMPLOYEES?
Poll: GLOBAL ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: IS REDUNDANCY RATE INCREASING?
|
24 posts back to top |
Posted 5 months ago With current global economic meltdown ravaging the world economy, the implications would be that organizations would be downsizing, cutting costs and strategizing to stay alive. In otherwords, employees would be laid-off, while overhead costs, operational and administrative costs would be drastically cut down. However, the increasing complexities in business models and strategies mandates a need to ensure awareness of and compliance with quality standards , internal policies, codes of condut, laws and refulations and a requirement to protect organizatinal image and its stakeholders from tghe increased exposure to risk. Hence, an identified failure/ non compliance with industrial labour laws can have a devastating effect on an organization as sanctions can be as severe as shutdown of operatios and imprisonment for responsible executives. On the part of management within the glabalized economy, employees laid off when provided with good benefits and pay off packages would be able to integrate and settledown on good business strategic implementation, thereby reduncing the multiplier effects of unemployment. Above, organisations with good compliance to labour laws and industrial relation legislations are sure of continuity of business. Contributions are welcomed, to brainstorm on the effects of global economic meltdown on employees, organisational image, and international relations. Thanks. |
|
Account Removed 0 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Although I do not hold a degree in Finance, Economics or Business, I can tell you that the redundancy rates around the world will increase due to the prevalence of greed and laziness. I've seen perfectly good employees let go (myself included) and the excuse used is always that it was for "business purposes". I know that, in the U.S. especially, if you have too many hard-working, competent employees on the payroll, it's going to get expensive to keep them, so they keep the lousy, lazy ones around to cut payroll costs (because they're always having their pay docked or their poor performance doesn't merit a raise). Sure, it's the fastest, easiest way to pad the books at the moment, but I guess they don't mind when the business goes under since they can just put on their resume how they "cut costs and increased revenue" for their last employer (the company that's now out of business) and get another job doing the same thing. Thank you for posting this. Do you have any ideas about how this can be dealt with? Have you ever been laid off? I look forward to your replies. P.S.: When I tried to answer the Poll, it would not allow me to submit my answer. I just thought you might want to know. By the way, my answer, obviously, was going to be YES. |
|
70 posts back to top |
| Posted 5 months ago Financial meltdown or economic meltdown which is very real! Indeed its real everywhere! However i can authoritatively say that some companies are not laying off their employees! Rather they are employing! Yes some organisations are laying off we agree, but my company has not laid off, rather we are employing more people and we look forward to employing more as the business expands. However, you can say all these about companies that obeys the labour laws. and the question now is, how many companies obeys and practice the labout laws and policies. I can tell you authoritatively that only very few do! If that is the case then in some companies layoff does not mean more pay, it means suffering and hardship, because some companies, will only pay you one month in lieu of notice after you laying you off! No benefits! However, some standard companies pay good benefits when they lay off. and its only very few that does that! Looking at the meltdown, one need to talk about the Nations/countries as regards their foreign reserve and basic ammenities and foreign exchange. If the foreign reserve is lower than expected, then the currency will suffer, and basic amenities will equally not be their. And when these are not in place, companies/organisations will deifnately downsize no matter what , which is basically what is happening now! Indeed 55% of organisations are laying off workers! And you cant blame them! Or can you? Yes organisation should lay off if they could not meet up with overheads! However, there are still better options or alternatives to laying off and cutting overheads. and this includes reducing salaries! I think that is more fair that just laying off without any good benefits. |
|
24 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago LaFifiG says ...
Dear Associate, I sympathise with on the circumstances analysed in your responce. However, I believe what employers of labour should be to pay off employees with good redundancy benefits, notice in lieu , monitesed medicals, annuals, etc, as well as introducing them to ENTREPRENEURAIL SKILLS AND TRAINING that would aid them setting up micro businesses on their own. With, the multiplier effects would be lessen, as well as reduction in crime rate in the society. Above all, don't give up! |
|
24 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago shandy says ...
Thanks for your response to this wonderful discussion. We all believe, things would get globally on the positive.
|
|
3 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago
<!--Session data-->
|
|
24 posts back to top |
| Posted 4 months ago erinm says ...
|